Philolzophy

Information

This article was written on 24 Oct 2012, and is filed under Huge Dumbasses.

Your ‘Year of Living Biblically’ Sucks Balls

If you haven’t seen this histrionic bizzatch around the internet yet, Rachel Held Evans is a blogger who wanted a book deal for doing something zany so she decided to “live biblically for a year.” Which basically meant that she was going to do a plain reading of the old testament and follow some rules set in a specific historical time and culture and ignore the theological interpretations of the new testament as a timeless covenant replacing an older covenant with a specific group of people in history.

As you can tell, I really don’t care for this woman. Not because she’s a future cover model for Twee Bitch Magazine but because she is purporting to do something she hasn’t attempted to do at all and cashing in on it.

I wanted to challenge the idea that “biblical womanhood” could be reduced to a list of roles and rules, and I wanted to do it in a creative, disarming way. I was thinking about this in the shower one morning, when I got a crazy idea: What if I tried it all? What if took the notion of biblical womanhood literally to show that it’s not as simple as it may sound?

As a result, I found myself growing out my hair, making my own clothes, caring for a computerized baby named Chip, consulting with Orthodox Jews, travelling to Amish country, interviewing a real “sister wife,” sitting on my roof, covering my head, and calling my husband “master.”

I just don’t understand what any of this has to do with living biblically. Like, I don’t want to tell you how to be part of a religion I am not a part of… but in light of you know, what the bible says, shouldn’t you be feeding the poor and caring for orphans in your home instead of spending your day on Etsy trying to figure out how to sew a cool dress?

IDK just feel sad about spirituality when its boiled down to something so stupid.

The reason I hate the Christian right is because they do things like this. Focus on the Family is big into spanking your children because it’s biblical. Except if you read the bible you’ll see that the command is to take your child in the public square and beat them. The purpose of spanking is to punish, not to inflict a great deal of physical pain. So, what you are drawing from the bible is what you want and what is socially acceptable and not what you claim it is at all.

Just stop grand standing. Try to find something you really believe in and you don’t have to lie to yourself about. Failing, at least try to help other people or something useful.

  • Me

    “This is why I hate the Christian right…” I’ll take blatant generalizations and shameless hypocrisy for $500, Alex.

  • http://philolzophy.tumblr.com/ phiLOLZophy

    and then i go on to provide a specific example…

  • me

    Sure. But it’s still labeling the entire group. Just like the Christian right labels all secular groups with their own exaggerations and presuppositions. There’s never much nuance in these discussions from either side.

  • http://philolzophy.tumblr.com/ phiLOLZophy

    IDK I think focus on the family is pretty noncontroversially a voice of the Christian right. It obviously doesn’t speak for everyone, but it’s not as if I took a very small belief and said everyone believes it. The spanking thing is really common, and I believe a lot if not most of their other platforms are based on the same faulty theological framework.

  • Ben

    Since you freely admit to not being a Christian, I think you have missed out on some the subtlety of RHE’s book/project. As somebody who grew up in the Christian Right (including a devotion to Focus on the Family), and has since left, I understand very well that the concept of “biblical womanhood” is used a blunt object to keep women in their place. Sure, her project was designed to grab attention–but it was designed to demonstrate how absurd this fallacious idea that pervades the Christian Right really is! Based on what I know about RHE, she would completely agree that what Christians should be doing on a daily basis is paying more attention to the New testament than the Old and helping the poor and orphaned. This is her way of encouraging Christians to do that instead of wasting time putting women down because of outdated social practices.

  • Lori

    RHE is a critic of the Christian right. There is a “biblical womanhood” movement among some conservative Christians that amounts to telling women to be subservient and know their place. RHE’s point is that these people–who claim that they are only doing the “biblical” thing by saying women can’t preach and that women’s role is to be at home–aren’t really being any more biblical than she, as an evangelical feminist, is. She’s showing that for all of their claims of literalism, they aren’t following the Bible literally, because following the Bible’s rules for women literally is ridiculous.

    I’m not nearly as big a fan of RHE as many, but she would be the first to agree with you that Christians should be about caring for the poor, not sewing purple dresses. Her “year of biblical womanhood” project was an experiment in exposing the absurdities of literalism, not a quest to be a really good Christian.

Recent articles

  • Dressing Like A Slut, I Guess15 Jun 2013
  • I Watched All 7 Seasons of The West Wing This Month07 Jun 2013
  • 04 Jun 2013
  • Bachelorette Recap: The Right Reasons04 Jun 2013
  • Some Questions about Feminism and Makeup04 Jun 2013

Recent comments